Therange. Like before, Audi SA will offer the Q5 with three engine types, including the 140 kW/400 N.m 2,0 TDI and the 260 kW/500 N.m SQ5 – which ditches the previous model’s barnstorming diesel engine in favour of a turbocharged 3,0-litre V6 petrol – as well as the mid-spec 2,0-litre turbopetrol driven here.
Allspecifications, performance and fuel economy data of Audi Q5 2.0 TDI (143) Quattro (105 kW / 143 PS / 141 hp), edition of the year 2010 since mid-year 2010 for Europe , including acceleration times 0-60 mph, 0-100 mph, 0-100 km/h, 0-200 km/h, quarter mile time, top speed, mileage and fuel economy, power-to-weight ratio, dimensions, drag
Findamazing local prices on Audi q5 2011 for sale Shop hassle-free with Gumtree, your local buying & selling community. Fuel Consumption. Any 23. 30+ mpg 23. 40+ mpg 16. Colour. Any 24. Black 8. Blue 1. Brown 1. Grey 5. Silver 2. White 7. Show 1 more. Engine size. 2011 Audi Q5 2.0 TDI QUATTRO DPF 5d 168 BHP LONG MOT CLEAN CARBurningOil Causes: Audi Q5. Here are some of the more common causes that your Q5 would start to burn oil: Piston Rings. The gap between you cylinder wall and the piston is measured in hundredths of an inch. Your Q5’s piston rings further close that gap and keep oil from leaving the crankcase and finding its way to the combustion chamber.TheBest fuel consumption is 53.11 mpg (one long distance French M/way holiday cruise) Overall Average 36.14 mpg (Audi DIS says Average is 37.7 mpg) Worst 30.33 mpg. I almost always use Shell V-Power - ( but have to agree I'm not convinced it gives more mpg but hope it will lubricate and protect better). FuelConsumption - Economy Combined: 38 MPG 6.2 L/100 km 46 MPG UK: Audi Q5 2.0 TDI 170HP Quattro DPF Body, Model and Production details. Generation : Type 8R: Audi Q5 2.0 TDI 170HP Quattro DPF Fuel Consumption (Economy), Emissions and Range. Fuel Consumption - Economy - Combined: Withthe same engine there is also Audi A5 version with four wheel (4x4) drive and manual gearbox (Audi A5 2009 2.0 TDI MT 4x4) available, which manufacturer's fuel consumption is higher by 0.6 litres per 100 km or 12 % - 5.8 litres per 100 km, whereas users reported real fuel consumption is similar - 7.0 litres per 100 km. tawN7e7.